As of 22 April 2009 this website is 'frozen' in time — see the current IFLA websites
This old website and all of its content will stay on as archive –
66th IFLA Council and General
|Is there a PLR system||Under which Legislation||Libraries covered||Materials covered||Right owners covered||Who is paying||Basis for remuneration||To whom is it paid||% of concerned libraries having an autom. system|
|Czech Republic||Yes, but not for books||Copyright law||All publicly open libraries||Music NOT FOR BOOKS!||All music authors||Libraries||According to yearly agreements||Collecting societies||58%|
|Latvia||Planned||Under discussion||Public libraries||Books||Latvian authors||Government||Number of books loaned by an author in libraries||Under discussion||0,01%|
|Lithuania**||Yes||Copyright law||Public libraries||Books||Not yet clear||Probably government||0%|
|Slovakia||Yes||Copyright law; Law on the collective admin., maybe library law||All libraries||Libraries; discussion with the government to pay are under way||Number of books loaned by an author in libraries||Collecting societies||10%|
|Slovenia||Yes, but not for books||Copyright law||All publicly funded libraries||Music NOT BOOKS!||Libraries||Number of located items||Collecting societies||70%|
** the frames are given in the new copyright law but the decrees are still in preparation
Three (Bulgaria, Poland, Romania) of the ten countries informed that they have no PLR system and no plans to establish one. Hungary has reported of negotiations with the collecting societies for remunerating music lending by libraries. In Slovenia the situation is clear, and no discussions are under way. The copyright law (§36/2) states that lending of text material is free. There is remuneration only for the lending of audio and video materials, and the form of payment is based on agreements between the libraries and the concerned collecting societies, which are nowadays two: one for music and one for other audio?visual materials. In the Czech Republic the situation is the same, but it was discussed in detail during the preparation of the new copyright law which, at the time of this paper, was still under work. Libraries were consulted in this negotiation. The Czech decided, based on §5.3 of the Lending and Rental directive, to continue the system where only lending of music is remunerated. This has been running since 1994. The system will be extended to cover lending of other visual and audio?visual documents.
In Estonia and Latvia PLR has been a hot discussion matter between copyright parties. The organisations of rightowners (in Estonia the authors association, in Latvia the collecting society AKKA/LAA) have pressed for a remuneration system. At the beginning of the process libraries were not even consulted, but in both countries libraries have managed to get themselves involved.
In Latvia some of the details are still under political debate. It has not been decided if the orders will be included into the copyright legislation or will there be a separate law. According to the draft in the Summer of 1999, the remuneration will be paid by the government and to the Latvian authors only. No common ground has been reached on whether the money will be paid directly to the authors or through collecting societies. The grant per author will be counted according to the number of loaned books of an author. In Latvia libraries have been alerted by the question on who will pay to libraries for counting the loans, when less than one per cent of the concerned libraries have an automated library system. If the plans will be realised, the sum to be disbursed to authors will be 10% of the funds spent on book acquisitions in public libraries in the preceding year.
In Lithuania the new copyright law of May 1999, provides a framework for the PLR system, which will be adopted on the 1st of July 2000. Libraries of educational and scientific institutions are excluded from the system. However a decision was made, due to economic difficulties, to provide no funding for the system at least in the first two years. The preparation of a more detailed decree has been postponed because of other matters on the political agenda.
In Slovakia the situation has been halted since the introduction of the new copyright law, which came into force in late 1997. Libraries do not accept the principle that even for the lending of books permission must be sought from the right owners. According to the latter, libraries must pay the remuneration for lending material. The law has not yet been executed in libraries, although collecting societies have insisted for it. The solution has been sought via the Library law that is still under preparation. The idea would be to move the burden of organising the authorisation system and payments of remuneration to the government.
At the end of 1998, some MPs together with the Estonian Association of Writers created a draft PLR law and sent it to the Parliament. The library community did not see the material until in the stage of discussion in the Cultural Affairs Committee of the Riigikogu (Parliament). To discuss the matter, a meeting with the initiation makers of the draft and representatives of writers was organised by librarians.
Librarians from different types of libraries were at present, as well as representatives of the Estonian Librarians Association and the Ministry of Culture. All participants agreed about the principal idea of remuneration. The real discussion theme was the mechanism and concrete solutions. The draft was made mostly according to the Finnish PLR system, without accounting the real situation in and possibilities of Estonian libraries. The general discussion was about to whom to pay and from witch source. The mixed financing system of public libraries, different systems for other libraries etc. need a careful analyse of real possibilities. At the same time the real situation with possible statistical data has to be considered. As most of public libraries have no IT lending systems, the real figures of loans can not be counted. The biggest concern of libraries is to find guaranties, that money for remuneration will be given by the state additionally, and not excluded from the very unsatisfying library budgets.
The meeting was fruitful as a starting point of further discussion. The debates about the matter were also continued in the press from both sides. It was agreed to continue to work on matter together with writers.
In 1999 a second attempt was made to send a draft PLR law to the Parliament without a consensus with libraries. The Cultural Affairs Committee did not accept the draft.
In 1999 major changes were made in the Copyright Law in Estonia. Some of them were caused by the changes in the real life, some had a connection to harmonisation with the EU directives. As Estonia has promised to harmonise the copyright matters before January 1, 2000, also the question of PLR rose again. The Cultural Affairs Committee asked for additional material about the PLR situation in different countries. Its' representative took part in a library meeting, where the matter was also discussed, etc. The draft of the new law was also sent to the National Library of Estonia for remarks.
As the final decision, an article was added to the Copyright Law: authors have right to get remuneration for rental and lending of their works. The list of libraries included into the system, amount of sums to be paid, and the system of payment has to be fixed by the Government. This part of the Copyright Law will come in force from January 1, 2002.
The Ministry of Culture has begun to prepare a proposal for the Government. It will form a working group, in which the library community will be largely involved to create optimal and mutually acceptable PLR system for Estonia.