As of 22 April 2009 this website is 'frozen' in time — see the current IFLA websites
This old website and all of its content will stay on as archive –
Publishers, database producers, subscription agents and other intermediaries are already on the market with their own "integrated electronic libraries" - many of these targetted and taylored towards the end user. These products have the potential of bypassing the academic libraries; some of the producers won't even deal with libraries! Some publishers offer discount to customers who go for electronic products only. This pricing strategy aims at eliminating the print edition in order to save costs in the future. What we are witnessing here is a dramatic change in the production processes and services. These changes require investments on a significant scale both from the producers and the customers.
Furthermore at the same time an increased cooperation and competition among publishers, database producers, agents and other intermediaries are taking place. Cooperation in the sense that publishers offer bibliographic data to database producers in order to increase the demand for their electronic full text journals. And competition often leading to mergers or as one can put it: cannibalism where large redundancy operations are taking place.
There is no sign whatsoever that this will not happen to libraries as well! It is to foresee, that if academic libraries want to survive as institutions, they will have to change their production processes and services as well, that the competition - and cooperation - between libraries and indeed cooperation between libraries and publishers, database producers, agents and other intermediaries will be increased.
A number of publishers offer consortia -- if their purchase power is big enough -- access to the whole range of their journals. That is, every member of the consortium will have electronic access not only to the journals currently subscribed to but all the journals. As we all know libraries currently subscribe only to those journals that they can afford on any specific time of date, and there will be a number of other journals of the specific publisher the library occasionally will have to interlend as well. Such a consortium agreement will give the library, and therefore also the user, extended access --that is better service-- and reduce the costs --that is staff costs and document delivery costs-- in interlending procedures. In my opinion, the costs for this is usually a modest increase in payments to the publisher.
Consortia purchasing offers for the single library the opportunity to get access to more journals than they currently have subscriptions to, thus eliminating the continuous cancellation operations. For the consortia members -the specific group of libraries- it offers reduced costs in the interinstitutional document delivery processes for those specific journals.
However there are a number of obstacles for the libraries to take adventage of this development. Firstly, there is the ever present funding problem. Entering consortia requires initial investments in licenses and information and communication technology. Here we face the problem, that most libraries at the beginning of the year have allocated nearly 100% of their funds to the day to day operations and services which means that there are little if any space for decisions during the course of the year. In the rapid changing environment of electronic publishing this is a very dangerous thing to do.
Secondly libraries are not prepared to cash in the savings offered by not handling the print edition of the journals. Their work procedures are still centered around the physical document, staff are not trained in handling electronic documents etc. Therefore many libraries are reluctant in entering consortia agreements especially where publishers impose payments for off-consortia delivery of documents, either in electronic or paper format.
Thirdly there will often be investments to be made in local - consortium based - central hardware set up, mounting of data, development of interfaces, administration of access etc. However those problems are precisely to be solved not by the single library but in cooperation between the participating libraries.
It is a common feature these days that national library authorities or university agencies establish programmes such as Electronic Libraries Programme, National Electronic Library programmes etc. Those programmes have often seed money to help libraries enter the new age by subsidizing the first generation of consortia licenses or national licenses. It is in my opinion very important to stress that it is nothing but seed money - and that I so far havenīt seen any signs that national agencies or universities have committed themselves to a long term increase in their funding of academic libraries. On the contrary, the seed money is expected to pay off in the sense that it is expected that libraries will be able to provide more, better, faster and cheaper services for less money in the future. What is expected is nothing but that libraries be able to change themselves and reengineer their services and operations in such a way that they meet user expectations better for less money.
The question is: how can this be done??
The answer to this simple question is quite simple too. The library must - in cooperation with other libraries - develop and implement a strategy consisting of a combination of the following features:
Funds have to be made available from the library budget. This can be done the following way: Firstly reduce the library "paper work" - that is whenever there is an electronic edition of a journal, the library will not handle the printed version. This is meant very litterally. The printed edition will not be registered, bar coded and made shelf ready: the printed edition will be non-existent in the library. This means that internal work procedures have to change accordingly.
Secondly prepare an adjustment of staff numbers - the reduction af the "paper work" must be followed by reducing the staff involved in those operations. What is suggested here is really, that you up front cash in the cost savings by not providing both print and electronic versions of specific journals
Thirdly invest in education and training for the staff to perform new work processes.
The library management must invest significant efforts in building consortia with other libraries in the region, on the national and international level. The available funds from the above maneuvers can be used for buying access to electronic journals and databases.
Establish cooperation with other libraries in building local hardware setups and interfaces that can handle large amounts of databases and electronic journals. Groups of libraries can - if they are determined - establish digital libraries with lots and lots of content available instantly for their users.
If the libraries really want to fight the current crisis they must interact in new ways. In reality what eventually must happen is that the concept of the single - primarily - self dependent library must fade away and the larger virtual library must be in place. We have for a number of years now talked about the virtual library. Now it must be in place very quickly.
Furthermore, what we will discover is a decreasing specialisation among libraries: the purchase of whole packages of journals has the effect that a given library suddenly will be in the position where it can provide service in other scientific disciplines.
This will eventually lead to an increased competition among libraries: the above development will push the competition between libraries due to the fact that the purchase dealing with publishers can be often made in such a manner that the library can resale documents on a pay per view or pay as you go basis. As a matter of fact libraries can develop into local or regional document delivery centers on a commercial basis.
Academic libraries will not only have to cooperate in whole new ways but will also have to engage with oneanother in more vendor-customer like relations.
The most important things here are making funds available for this development by reducing the library "paper work" and adjusting staff numbers involved in those processes.
Universities must change their primary operations drastically in the coming years. Conventional educational strategies are way too expensive to meet the demands for further education and lifelong learning in our societies. I cannot see any signs why libraries can avoid to change their operations drastically as well - if they want to survive.
With the developments in scientific publishing and implementation of new technologies we have a historical and unique opportunity to use technology - not to do old things differently, but for the first time to do different things.