   
IFLA Working Group on Digital Library Inventories
Archive - Historical Material
Notes from the Group's first meeting, held during the Bangkok Conference, August 25, 1999.
Present:
Marie-Thérèse Varlamoff, IFLA PAC
Ania Zalenskaia, IFLA PAC
Diann Rusch-Feja, Max Planck-Institut for Human Development, Library & Research Documentation, and IFLA Section on Information Technology (SIT)
Terry Kuny, IFLA UDT and National Library of Canada
Yuri Hohlov, Institute of the Information Society, and IFLA SIT
Tatiana Ershova, Institute of the Information Society
Sonia Zillhardt, Bibliothèque nationale de France, and UNESCO Bibliotheca universalis project
Sally McCallum, Library of Congress
Alexander Plemnek, Open Society Institute Russia
Mats Lindquist, Lund University Library
Sara Gould, IFLA UAP
This was an informal meeting of people involved in the development of inventories of digital collections. The meeting was not concerned with the digitisation process or the digitisation of collections themselves, but solely with the large number of inventories or directories which are being created with the aim of listing digitisation activity in one form or another.
Those attending the meeting were invited because they were known to be involved in some sort of digital library inventory and were already attending the IFLA Conference. It is recognised that there are many more projects and organisations with similar aims which were not represented.
Aim of the meeting
Digitisation of library collections is a rapidly growing area. There is also a growing number of projects and programmes which aim to record what digitisation activity has taken or is taking place, some of which aim to identify important collections and to encourage their digitisation, and some of which simply record existing digital collections. Many are national in their coverage, some aim to be international; some have specific subject coverage or are limited by some other content criteria.
What does not appear to exist is very much coordination between these projects. While the stated aim of many inventories is to reduce duplication of effort when digitising collections, there appears to be no attempt to avoid duplication of effort when creating the inventories themselves, since little regard appears to be paid to what type of directory or inventory exists already. Unless interoperability, or at least cooperation, between different inventories is given high priority, it is difficult to see how a duplication of digitisation effort can be achieved.
The aims of the meeting were
- to inform each other about our various inventory projects currently in progress
- to identify areas of mutual concern
- to consider what benefit there would be in attempting to coordinate the work of the various projects
- to recognise the need for consistency between different inventories and to encourage interoperability
The challenge of creating an effective inventory
A very worthwhile discussion took place in which a great deal of information was presented to the group, and very many areas of concern were examined. The core project which prompted the meeting initially was the IFLA/UNESCO Survey on Digitisation and Preservation. This project, being carried out jointly by IFLA PAC and IFLA UAP in the framework of UNESCO's "Memory of the World" Programme, has three strands:
- a survey to examine current activity in the area of digitisation of cultural heritage collections worldwide, resulting in a report of the survey results. The report has been published as International Preservation Issues, No 2.
- the development of a web-based "Directory of Digitised Library Collections". This Directory aims to list major cultural heritage library collections which have been digitised. As part of the "Memory of the World" Programme, the emphasis is on cultural heritage collections and major libraries and other important cultural institutions. The Directory will be hosted eventually and maintained in the long term by UNESCO
- A report on digital preservation. This will consist of an extended article to be published in International Preservation News, and will highlight current activity in this important area.
The main part of the project is the development of the Directory. The challenges which this particular Directory raises are reflective of very many similar inventories, and were considered at some length during the meeting. It was recognised that there is probably a need for some sort of listing of digitised collections: just as bibliographies are essential to record a nation's output, or the holding of a particular library, then so is it necessary to record digital collections in some way. However it is clear that creating an inventory such as the IFLA/UNESCO Directory is fraught with challenges, making it essential to establish the scope of the directory at the very beginning. Basic questions, such as the level at which collections are described - separate records for each item, for each 'significant part' of the collection, or just one record for the whole collection - are key to the development of an effective database, but it proves very difficult to set the record creation at the correct level. Where a national inventory already exists, such as the Canadian National Digital Inventory, it would seem pointless to create a large number of collection-level records in an international database, when one link direct to the Canadian national inventory would offer the same range of information. On the other hand, to offer different levels of searchable records in an international database, depending purely on the existence or otherwise of a national inventory, would create an unbalanced service, where subject searches would reveal large numbers or records for those countries whose collections were recorded individually, and no 'hits' at all for countries for which the only entry was a link to the national inventory, hosted elsewhere on the Internet.
This sort of challenge might be overcome by using search engines which would search not only the international directory itself but also all of the linked sites, so that a full search could be made. Of course this might only possible where a common data model existed, which does not yet appear to be being developed in this area.
Interoperability and cooperation
The meeting agreed that interoperability between inventories should be a target, but it was recognised also that for those project which had already begun, this was too late to be considered in detail. The IFLA/UNESCO Directory, for example, was required to remain within the framework of its contract with UNESCO, and could not at this stage embark on developing the database to conform to any international standards. While this was regrettable, lessons would be learnt in this area, and it was generally agreed that no new inventory-type projects should begin without taking into account international guidelines or advice on best practice which existed already, and without relating new inventories to those already in existence.
The Russian Digital Library project aims to become a one-stop shop for digital library issues. The website would include digitised collections, and digital library events and bibliographies, and represents another national development in the area of digital library inventories. The IFLA Section on Information Technology (SIT) had also explored in some detail the feasibility of developing an international digital library inventory, a proposal that the Section had been keen to pursue in 1998. However there was doubt over the need for another international inventory, which may be similar but unrelated to the IFLA/UNESCO Directory, especially in view of the earlier agreement that new inventories should not now be developed in isolation. This issue is still being discussed within the Section.
There was general agreement that cooperation, coordination and interoperability should be key considerations in the area of digital library inventories. Work on defining collection profiles and interoperability standards should take priority over the development of new inventories per se.
In order to build on the very useful discussions of this first meeting, Terry Kuny agreed to set up a closed mailing list for those who attended this meeting and others who had an interest in this area. The list and the group would be called the Inventories WG. Terry would also allocate an area of Iflanet, to which he would add documents relating to existing standards for describing digital collections (EAD, ZIG ...), definitions of data models, and other items including a scope note about this new working group. One of the major benefits of this meeting was the opportunity for different sections and groups within IFLA to come together to explore common concerns, and to identify areas in which closer cooperation may be possible in the future.
Sara Gould
November 1999
|